Clinical Research & Regulatory

Biologics and Biosimilars vs Brands and Generics: Same, Yet Unique

Why a biosimilar is not simply a generic biologic: the science, the economics and the approval pathways explained.

AE Ahmed El ErakyMedical Sales Representative, Acino · CMSL graduate · December 14, 2022 · 5 min read Related program: CMAP Share

Every brand-name drug can have generics. Every biologic can have biosimilars. They sound like the same idea, but the science, the regulation and the economics behind them are very different.

Drugs vs biologics

A drug is produced by synthetic chemical reactions, combining specific ingredients in an ordered process. Drugs generally have well-defined chemical structures, and the finished product can be analysed to identify all its components.

A biologic is engineered in a living system, such as a microorganism, plant or animal cell, often using recombinant DNA technology. Most biologics are very large, complex molecules or mixtures of molecules. Laboratory methods can make it difficult, if not impossible, to fully characterize them, and some components of a finished biologic may be unknown.

Why the process is the productLiving systems are sensitive to the tiniest changes in manufacturing, and small variations can affect a biologic’s nature and function. Manufacturers therefore use hundreds of process controls and tightly control starting materials to keep the process consistent over time.

Generics vs biosimilars

A generic is manufactured to be the same as an existing brand-name drug in dosage form, safety, efficacy, route of administration, quality, performance and indications. It is bioequivalent: it works the same way and gives the same clinical benefit. It shares the active ingredient but may differ in inactive characteristics, such as colour or flavour. Because the brand molecule has a well-defined chemical structure, it can be copied exactly.

Biologics are much larger, with primary, secondary, tertiary and possibly quaternary structures. A biosimilar is therefore designed to be highly similar to its reference biologic. It must have the same amino acid sequence and show similar physical, chemical and biological properties, efficacy and safety. Minor differences in clinically inactive components are allowed, but there must be no clinically meaningful differences in safety, purity or potency.

Some describe biosimilars as the “generic version” of biologics. Others avoid the term, because biosimilars are not exact copies of their reference products.

Patents and market entry

A company that develops a new medicine sells it under a brand name, protected by a patent so that only the patent owner can manufacture and market it. Patents let inventors recover the money and time spent creating a new product.

When a patent lapses, regulators such as the FDA approve generics on confirmation of pharmaceutical equivalence and bioequivalence. Because small molecules share the same chemical structure, comparing blood levels of the brand and the generic shows they have the same activity. Competition then lowers prices. The same principle applies to biosimilars, but the economics differ:

~2 yearsand $1–10 million to develop a conventional generic
5–10 yearsand $100–250 million to bring a biosimilar to market
$1–1.8 bnfor an originator to gain approval for a new medicine

Common types of biologics

  • Hormones (growth hormone, parathyroid hormone, insulin): substances produced by one tissue and carried in the blood to act on another.
  • Interferons: proteins produced by cells in response to viral infection and other stimuli.
  • Interleukins: cytokines that direct immune cells to divide and differentiate.
  • Growth factors: substances that promote cell growth, such as G-CSF (filgrastim) and erythropoietin.
  • Monoclonal antibodies: a single species of immunoglobulin, directed against one epitope of an antigen.
  • Polypeptides and proteins: peptides usually have fewer than 50 amino acids, while proteins have more.
  • Vaccines: antigens that stimulate the immune system to produce specific antibodies.

How reference biologics are approved

Developers first complete laboratory and animal studies, including repeat-dose toxicity, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and adverse events. They then submit an investigational new drug (IND) application to the FDA, or a clinical trial application (CTA) in Europe. Clinical development follows three phases:

  1. Phase I: metabolism, pharmacology and safety in humans at single or increasing doses.
  2. Phase II: proof of concept, dose finding and initial safety.
  3. Phase III: large randomized controlled trials confirming efficacy, outcomes and adverse events.

Characterization studies also describe the structural elements responsible for biological activity, the interactions between active ingredient and excipients, and stability under different formulation, manufacturing and storage conditions.

How biosimilars are approved

The reference product’s manufacturing process is confidential, so biosimilar developers reverse-engineer it, often using newer analytical techniques. This produces extensive comparative data. FDA and EMA requirements are broadly similar, and include:

  • Structural and functional assays, and animal toxicology, PK, PD and immunogenicity studies.
  • Comparative clinical PK studies, typically on maximum serum concentration (Cmax) and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC).
  • Usually at least one randomized trial in an approved indication, showing comparability, not just non-inferiority.
  • For an FDA interchangeability designation, historically a switching study.

Two notable differences: the EMA requires a post-marketing surveillance plan, and in Europe individual countries decide on interchangeability or switching.

Examples of US-approved biosimilars (as of December 2022)

Reference productExample biosimilars
AdalimumabAmjevita, Cyltezo, Hyrimoz, Hadlima, Abrilada, Hulio
BevacizumabMvasi, Zirabev
Epoetin alfaRetacrit
EtanerceptErelzi, Eticovo
FilgrastimZarxio, Nivestym
InfliximabInflectra, Renflexis, Avsola, Ixifi
Insulin glargineSemglee
PegfilgrastimFulphila, Udenyca, Ziextenzo, Nyvepria
RanibizumabByooviz
RituximabTruxima, Ruxience, Riabni
TrastuzumabOgivri, Herzuma, Ontruzant, Trazimera, Kanjinti

Key takeaways

  • Generics are exact copies of small molecules, approved on bioequivalence.
  • Biosimilars are highly similar, but not identical, to complex biologics made in living systems.
  • For biologics, the manufacturing process defines the product.
  • Biosimilar approval needs extensive analytical, PK and clinical comparability data.

References

  1. Blackstone EA, Joseph PF. The economics of biosimilars. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2013;6(8):469-478.
  2. Chan JCN, Chan ATC. Biologics and biosimilars: what, why and how? ESMO Open. 2017;2(1):e000180. doi:10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000180
  3. Patel PK, King CR, Feldman SR. Biologics and biosimilars. J Dermatolog Treat. 2015;26(4):299-302. doi:10.3109/09546634.2015.1054782
  4. van de Vooren K, Curto A, Garattini L. Biosimilar versus generic drugs: same but different? Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015;13:125-127. doi:10.1007/s40258-015-0154-9

Knowledge check

Test yourself in 3 questions

0 / 3 answered

Question 1 of 3

Why are biosimilars not considered exact copies of their reference biologics?

Correct answer: B. Biologics are complex and sensitive to the manufacturing process. Biosimilars must be highly similar, with no clinically meaningful differences, but cannot be identical.

Question 2 of 3

Generic approval mainly relies on demonstrating:

Correct answer: B. Because small molecules have well-defined structures, generics are approved on pharmaceutical equivalence and bioequivalence to the brand.

Question 3 of 3

Which endpoints are typical in comparative clinical PK studies for biosimilars?

Correct answer: A. Clinical PK similarity is typically shown on Cmax and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC).

Found this useful?

We copy a ready-written professional post for you. Paste it in LinkedIn, and the article card with its image is attached automatically.

Share on LinkedIn

Go deeper

Understand the full development path with CMAP

The Clinical Research Fundamentals masterclass takes you from IND filing to real-world evidence, with the regulatory pathways in between.

  • Drug development and regulatory pathways
  • RCTs vs RWE, accelerated approvals and IRBs
  • Oncology trial designs
  • Part of the CMAP Medical Affairs Diploma

Keep reading

More from APA Academy

WhatsApp